Understanding PID Controllers in Modern Applications

A PID controller (Proportional-Integral-Derivative controller) is a type of process controller that calculates the difference between a desired set point and a process variable—then adjusts system output to minimize that difference. These devices are widely used in industries for regulating temperature, pressure, flow, and more.

Despite the emergence of advanced automation systems, PID controllers remain highly effective in many applications, especially when managing stable systems with straightforward goals.

How PID Controllers Work

A PID controller continually monitors a process and applies corrections based on three components:

 
  • Proportional: Corrects based on the present error.

  • Integral: Corrects past errors by eliminating offset.

  • Derivative: Predicts future errors based on the rate of change.

 

Example: Cruise Control

Think of a car's cruise control system. The desired speed is the set point. As the car slows down uphill, the PID controller increases its throttle. On a downhill, it reduces power. This same concept applies to industrial systems like temperature controllers and electric heaters.

 

The History and Reliability of PID Control

The PID control algorithm dates back to 1922, when engineer Nicolas Minorsky first introduced it. Its popularity surged thanks to its analog simplicity, and it remained dominant as digital control systems grew.

Even today, PID controllers are favored for their:

 
  • Simplicity

  • Low cost

  • Fast response time

  • Compatibility with existing equipment

 
Where PID Controllers Excel

PID controllers are especially effective in:

 
  • First-order systems like electric heaters, where the system naturally stabilizes after being turned off.

  • Temperature control applications that require consistent heat output.

  • Basic process control loops with a single input and output.

 

Real-World Use Case: Electric Heater

In an industrial oven using an electric heater, a temperature controller based on PID logic can maintain a stable internal temperature by adjusting power output in real-time.

Limitations of Traditional PID Control

While reliable, PID controllers have their constraints:

 
  • Less effective during complex startup/shutdown stages

  • Can’t handle systems with competing elements (e.g., heating and cooling simultaneously)

  • Struggle with non-linear or reactive systems

 

For instance, in a system where two chemicals create an exothermic reaction, a basic temperature controller may not respond accurately to the sudden surge in heat.

When to Consider Advanced Control Strategies

As process requirements become more dynamic, alternatives to standalone PID controllers offer greater efficiency. Some options include:

Feed-Forward Control

Enhances the PID controller by accounting for known disturbances, helping reach set points more quickly and accurately.

Model Predictive Control (MPC)

Uses mathematical models to forecast future outcomes and optimize control decisions across multiple variables.

Cascade Control

Links two PID loops, where the primary loop sets the target for the secondary loop—ideal for systems with fast-changing inner dynamics.

Override Control

Uses two PID controllers and a switch to choose output based on conditions (e.g., selecting the highest or lowest output for safety or efficiency).

 

Why Consider Upgrading?

Efficiency = Profitability

Even minor inefficiencies add up. Consider a pizza oven using an electric heater:

 
  • If the oven drops below the 400°F set point and takes longer to recover, cooking times increase.

  • Over time, these delays result in wasted energy, time, and labor.

 

Modern process controllers can optimize recovery times, minimize overshoots, and maintain tighter control, boosting productivity and lowering energy costs.

Key Questions Before Choosing a PID Controller

To evaluate if a PID controller is right for your system, ask:

Is My Process Naturally Stable?

 
  • First-order systems (e.g., single-element electric heaters) are ideal for PID.

  • Second-order systems (e.g., heater + chiller) often need more advanced control logic.

 

Are There Reactive Factors or Delayed Feedback?

 
  • If your process involves chemical reactions or complex thermal changes, a standard PID controller may not react fast enough.

 

Temperature Controllers and Electric Heaters: A Common Pairing

Temperature controllers powered by PID logic are frequently paired with electric heaters in industrial applications. These controllers regulate the heater’s output to ensure consistent product quality and energy efficiency.

Watlow®, for instance, offers advanced temperature control solutions designed to work seamlessly with electric heating elements, improving performance and reducing operational costs.

Partner with Watlow® for Smarter Process Control

At Watlow®, we help manufacturers and engineers evaluate and select the right process controllers for their systems—whether it's a traditional PID controller or a modern predictive solution.

We help you:

 
  • Analyze your system requirements

  • Recommend the ideal temperature or process controller

  • Optimize your control loop for energy savings and better process stability

 

Let Watlow® help you improve control, efficiency, and reliability. Contact us today to begin selecting the best controller for your system.

Final Verdict: Is PID Control Still Good Enough?

Absolutely—in the right environment. For stable, simple processes like electric heating, a PID controller remains a reliable and cost-effective solution. But in complex or highly variable systems, newer control technologies offer measurable improvements in precision, efficiency, and scalability.